Abstract
One of the reasons why the Neural Correlates of Consciousness Program could appear attractive in the 1990s was that it seemed to disentangle theoretical and empirical problems. Theoretical disagreements could thus be sidestepped in order to focus on empirical research regarding the neural substrate of consciousness. One of the further consequences of this dissociation of empirical and theoretical questions was that fundamental questions regarding the Mind Body Problem or the “Hard Problem of Consciousness” could remain unresolved even if the search for the neural correlates had been successful.
Drawing on historical examples, a widely held consensus in the philosophy of science, and actual NCC research we argue that there is no such independence. Moreover, as the dependence between the theoretical and the empirical level is mutual, empirical progress will go hand in hand with theoretical development. Thus, contrary to what the original NCC program suggested, we conclude that NCC research may significantly take advantage from and contribute to theoretical progress in our explanation and understanding of consciousness. Eventually, this might even contribute to a solution of the Hard Problem of Consciousness.
References
Anton, G. (1899). Ueber die Selbstwahrnehmung der Herderkrankungen des Gehirns durch den Kranken bei Rindenblindheit und Bindentaubheit. Archiv für Psychiatrie Und Nervenkrankheiten, 32(1), 86–127. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02126945
Baars, B. J. (1996). Understanding subjectivity: Global workspace theory and the resurrection of the observing self. Journal of Consciousness Studies, 3(3), 211–217.
Baars, B. J. (1997). In the theatre of consciousness: Global workspace theory, a rigorous scientific theory of consciousness. Journal of Consciousness Studies, 4(4), 292–309.
Block, N. (1995). On a confusion about a function of consciousness. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 18(2), 227–247. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00038188
Block, N. (2005). Two neural correlates of consciousness. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 9(2), 46–52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2004.12.006
Block, N. (2007). Consciousness, accessibility, and the mesh between psychology and neuroscience. The Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 30(5-6), 481–548. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X07002786
Block, N. (2019). What is wrong with the no-report paradigm and how to fix it. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 23(12), 1003–1013. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2019.10.001
Carvajal, J., Cárdenas, A., Pazmiño, G., & Herrera, P. (2012). Visual anosognosia (anton-babinski syndrome): Report of two cases associated with ischemic cerebrovascular disease. Journal of Behavioral and Brain Science, 2(3), 394–398. https://doi.org/10.4236/jbbs.2012.23045
Chalmers, D. J. (1998). On the search for the neural correlate of consciousness. In S. R. Hameroff, A. W. Kaszniak, & A. C. Scott (Eds.), Toward a Science of Consciousness II (pp. 2–219). MIT Press.
Chalmers, D. J. (2000). What is a neural correlate of consciousness? In T. Metzinger (Ed.) Neural Correlates of Consciousness (pp. 17–39). MIT Press.
Chang, H. (2012). Is Water H2O? Evidence, Pluralism and Realism. Springer.
Crick, F., & Koch, C. (1990). Towards a neurobiological theory of consciousness. Seminars in the Neurosciences, 2, 263–275.
Das, M. J., & Naqvi, I. A. (2021). Anton syndrome [updated 2021 April 10]. In StatPearls, https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK538155/.
Dehaene, S., Changeux, J.-P., Naccache, L., Sackur, J., & Sergent, C. (2006). Conscious, preconscious, and subliminal processing: A testable taxonomy. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 10(5), 204–211. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2006.03.007
Dehaene, S., & Naccache, L. (2001). Towards a cognitive neuroscience of consciousness: Basic evidence and a workspace framework. Cognition, 79(1), 1–37. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0010-0277(00)00123-2
Duhem, P. M. M., Wiener, P. P., Vuillemin, J., & Broglie, L. de. (1991). The Aim and Structure of Physical Theory. Princeton University Press.
Eccles, J. C. (1994). How the Self Controls Its Brain. Springer.
Flohr, H. (1992). Qualia and brain processes. In A. Beckermann, H. Flohr, & J. Kim (Eds.), Emergence or Reduction?: Essays on The Prospects of Nonreductive Physicalism (pp. 220–238). W. De Gruyter.
Frässle, S., Sommer, J., Jansen, A., Naber, M., & Einhäuser, W. (2014). Binocular rivalry: Frontal activity relates to introspection and action but not to perception. Journal of Neuroscience, 34(5), 1738–1747. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4403-13.2014
Gazzaniga, M. S., & LeDoux, J. E. (1978). The Integrated Mind. Springer.
Gligorov, N. (2017). Don’t worry, this will only hurt a bit: The role of expectation and attention in pain intensity. The Monist, 100(4), 501–513. https://doi.org/10.1093/monist/onx025
Gracely, R. H., Dubner, R., & McGrath, P. A. (1982). Fentanyl reduces the intensity of painful tooth pulp sensations: Controlling for detection of active drugs. Anesthesia and Analgesia, 61(9), 751–755.
Haxby, J. V. (2012). Multivariate pattern analysis of fMRI: The early beginnings. NeuroImage, 62(2), 852–855. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.03.016
Haynes, J.-D. (2009). Decoding visual consciousness from human brain signals. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 13(5), 194–202. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2009.02.004
Kini, A., Khatker, M., Lee, A. G., Othman, B. A., & Ponce, C. P. (2019). Anton syndrome. Eye Wiki: American Academy of Ophthalmology. https://eyewiki.aao.org/Anton_Syndrome
Koch, C. (2004). The Quest for Consciousness: A Neurobiological Approach. Roberts & Co.
Koch, C., & Crick, F. (2002). The neuronal basis of visual consciousness. https://authors.library.caltech.edu/40600/1/465.pdf
Koch, C., Massimini, M., Boly, M., & Tononi, G. (2016). Neural correlates of consciousness: Progress and problems. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 17(5), 307–321. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrn.2016.22
Kristjánsson, Á., & Campana, G. (2010). Where perception meets memory: A review of repetition priming in visual search tasks. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 72(1), 5–18. https://doi.org/10.3758/APP.72.1.5
Kuhn, T. (1962). The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. University of Chicago Press.
Lamme, V. A. F. (2006). Towards a true neural stance on consciousness. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 10(11), 494–501. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2006.09.001
Lau, H., & Rosenthal, D. (2011). Empirical support for higher-order theories of conscious awareness. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 15(8), 365–373. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2011.05.009
Legrain, V., Iannetti, G. D., Plaghki, L., & Mouraux, A. (2011). The pain matrix reloaded: A salience detection system for the body. Progress in Neurobiology, 93(1), 111–124. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pneurobio.2010.10.005
Libet, B. (1994). A testable field theory of mind-brain interaction. Journal of Consciousness Studies, 1, 119–126.
Libet, B. W. (1996). Solutions to the hard problem of consciousness. Journal of Consciousness Studies, 3, 33–35.
Logothetis, N. K., Pauls, J., Augath, M., Trinath, T., & Oeltermann, A. (2001). Neurophysiological investigation of the basis of the fMRI signal. Nature, 412(6843), 150–157. https://doi.org/10.1038/35084005
Maddula, M., Lutton, S., & Keegan, B. (2009). Anton’s syndrome due to cerebrovascular disease: A case report. Journal of Medical Case Reports, 3, 9028. https://doi.org/10.1186/1752-1947-0003-0000009028
Makin, S. (2016). Imaging: Show me where it hurts. Nature, 535(7611), 8–9. https://doi.org/10.1038/535S8a
Michel, M. (2017). Methodological artefacts in consciousness science. Journal of Consciousness Studies, 24(11-12), 94–117.
Michel, M., & Morales, J. (2020). Minority reports: Consciousness and the prefrontal cortex. Mind and Language, 35(4), 493–513. https://doi.org/10.1111/mila.12264
Michelson, A. A., & Morley, E. W. (1887). On the relative motion of the earth and the luminiferous ether. American Journal of Science, s3-34(203), 333–345. https://doi.org/10.2475/ajs.s3-34.203.333
Milner, A. D., & Goodale, M. A. (2008). Two visual systems re-viewed. Neuropsychologia, 46(3), 774–785. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2007.10.005
Naber, M., Frässle, S., & Einhäuser, W. (2011). Perceptual rivalry: Reflexes reveal the gradual nature of visual awareness.PloS One, 6(6), e20910. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0020910
Naccache, L., & Dehaene, S. (2007). Reportability and illusions of phenomenality in the light of the global neuronal workspace model. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 30(5-6), 518–520. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X07002993
Nisbett, R. E., & Wilson, T. D. (1977). Telling more than we can know: Verbal reports on mental processes. Psychological Review, 84(3), 231–259.
Overgaard, M., & Grünbaum, T. (2012). Cognitive and non-cognitive conceptions of consciousness. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 16(3), 137. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2011.12.006
Phillips, I., & Morales, J. (2020). The fundamental problem with no-cognition paradigms. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 24(3), 165–167.
Prichep, L. S., John, E. R., Howard, B., Merkin, H., & Hiesiger, E. M. (2011). Evaluation of the pain matrix using EEG source localization: A feasibility study. Pain Medicine (Malden, Mass.), 12(8), 1241–1248. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1526-4637.2011.01191.x
Quine, W. V. (1981). Theories and Things. Belknap Press.
Rainville, P., Duncan, G. H., Price, D. D., Carrier, B., & Bushnell, M. C. (1997). Pain affect encoded in human anterior cingulate but not somatosensory cortex. Science (New York, N.Y.), 277(5328), 968–971. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.277.5328.968
Rosenthal, D. M. (1986). Two concepts of consciousness. Philosophical Studies: An International Journal for Philosophy in the Analytic Tradition, 49(3), 329–359. http://www.jstor.org/stable/4319832
Sellars, W. (1956). Empiricism and the philosophy of mind. Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Science, 1(19), 253–329.
Singer, T., Seymour, B., O’Doherty, J., Kaube, H., Dolan, R. J., & Frith, C. D. (2004). Empathy for pain involves the affective but not sensory components of pain. Science (New York, N.Y.), 303(5661), 1157-1162. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1093535
Tsuchiya, N., Wilke, M., Frässle, S., & Lamme, V. A. F. (2015). No-report paradigms: Extracting the true neural correlates of consciousness. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 19(12), 757–770. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2015.10.002
Woo, C.-W., Schmidt, L., Krishnan, A., Jepma, M., Roy, M., Lindquist, M. A., Atlas, L. Y., & Wager, T. D. (2017). Quantifying cerebral contributions to pain beyond nociception. Nature Communications, 8(1), 14211. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms14211
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Copyright (c) 2021 Michael Pauen